precis så här. och exakt därför.
bör vi organisera oss anarkistiskt, temporär-strukturellt byggt på immanent funktion
det stora trädet kan huggas av på ett ställe och då döda helheten
The fourth principle of the rhizome is the principle of asignifying rupture. This principle states: ”A rhizome may be broken, shattered at a given spot, but it will start up again on one of its old lines, or on new lines” (Deleuze and Guattari, 1987, p. 9). Movements and flows are always rerouted around disruptions in a rhizomatic formation. Additionally, severed sections regenerate themselves and continue to grow, forming new lines, flows, and pathways.
Deleuze & Guattari
Prenumerera på:
Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom)
think of maps as producing effective spatial articulations rather than simply (re)presenting space
SvaraRaderaD&G
Although Deleuze and Guattari saw rhizomatics as necessary to any radical political work, they rejected utopianism and insisted, following Antonio Gramsci, that rhizomatic formations are always constructed in the struggle between stabilizing and destabilizing forces. To further explain the nature and functions of rhizomatic formations, Deleuze and Guattari suggested using the linear algebraic metaphors of lines or vectors to think about rhizomes. They posited two basic kinds of lines or vectors: lines of articulation (or consistency) and lines of flight, both of which project their effects across the rhizomatic field. Lines of articulation connect and unify different practices and effects. They establish hierarchies. They define center-periphery relations. They create rules of organization. They encourage stasis. In contrast, lines of flight disarticulate non-necessary relations between and among practices and effects. They open up contexts to their outsides and the possibilities that dwell there. They disassemble unity and coherence. They decenter centers and disrupt hierarchies.
SvaraRadera